- Subject: Re: suspend of XJed
- From: Jörg Sommer <joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 11:34:39 +0000 (UTC)
Hello John,
Jörg Sommer <joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "John E. Davis" <davis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg?= Sommer <joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>BTW: What's your decision regarding the window popup problem for XJed?
>>>  It's not possible to bring XJed in forground, if it isn't active.
>>>  suspend() suspends the editor, if it hasn't the focus, but I want to
>>>  raise it as requested from another application.
>>
>>   Would removing the "kill (0, SIGSTOP)" line in xterm.c be sufficient
>> to deal with the issue?
>
> If you implement the suspend somehow else, yes. I think dropping the
> suspend functionality is not a good idea, because a suspend of XJed from
> within an xterm is useful. IMO, you should add a function xjed_raise.
What do you think about this patch:
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-jed/jed/branches/0.99.19/debian/patches/x_toggle_visibility.dpatch?op=file&rev=0&sc=0
BTW: You can find all the patches applied to the Debian package on
  (for experimental:)
  http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-jed/jed/branches/0.99.19/debian/patches/?rev=0&sc=0
  (for unstable:)
  http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-jed/jed/trunk/debian/patches/?rev=0&sc=0
Bye, Jörg.
-- 
“Hey, dad, you see how this man can twist his fingers? Amazing, isn't
it?” “No, son, not really. He's been using Emacs for ten years…”
--------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to <jed-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx> with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body.
Need help? Email <jed-users-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx>.
  [2007 date index]
  [2007 thread index]
  
  [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
      
  [Date Prev] [Date Next]