- Subject: Re: Brief and keydefs
- From: "G. Milde" <g.milde@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:16:15 +0200
On 12.10.05, Marko Mahnic wrote:
> G. Milde wrote:
> >Why do the keystrings differ between xjed and fljed?
>
> Right. They probably shouldn't. Do you know of any
> list of more or less standard keystrings that I could
> use?
No, I use showkey_literal()
(see the EXAMPLE in the doc to get_keystring()
in jedmodes.sf.net/mode/strutils/ )
in xjed or xkeycap to find the string values for X11.
> After looking at termtypes.master I see that every terminal
> uses its own set of keystrings.
So I'd stick to the X11 definitions. If there is no keystring in X11
(as for e.g. Shift_Tab), choose one from a terminal that
- is compatible with X11
- is comprehensive
I once wondered whether to switch to the IBMPC strings completely (and
experimented with keymaps for the console) but gave up.
> Anyway, it shouldn't matter since xjed and fljed both 'create' the
> keystrings and thus they could both use the same table of keystrings.
IMHO, fljed keystrings should become a superset of xjed ones.
> Currently I am supporting exotic things like Ctrl-Shift-KP_Home,
> but this will probably not be on any standard list...
Providing all "exotic" multiple-modifier-strang-key combinations will
bloat jed and slowdown the startup.
Provide the means to set up such keys instead (and document it).
So I hope, fljed comes with an fl_set_keysym().
x_set_keysym(), unfortunately doesnot allow multiple modifieres, so the
Key_Shift_Control_Right for "mark next word" in CUA mode is impossible to
set.
Guenter
--
G.Milde web.de
--------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to <jed-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx> with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body.
Need help? Email <jed-users-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx>.
[2005 date index]
[2005 thread index]
[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
[Date Prev] [Date Next]