- Subject: Re: new development snapshot available
- From: "G. Milde" <g.milde@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 18:00:48 +0100
On 1.03.05, SANGOI DINO wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: John E. Davis
> > Sent: sabato 26 febbraio 2005 19.43
> > Subject: new development snapshot available
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Today I released pre-0.99-17.70. You can get it from
>
> Well, I see that you merged most of my patches. Thanks!
>
> > 66. lib/cua.sl: Use delete_char_cmd instead of delete_cmd (SANGOID DINO).
>
> I still think that Günter may want to comment on this.
I am still waiting for a debian package to test jed 99.17 (too busy writing
my thesis (and depending on jed for that) to start compiling).
> After looking at his cuamisc.sl on jedmodes, I see that there is a
> delete_cmd() function. It is different form delete_char_cmd() because
> is region-aware: if you have a region marked, delete_cmd() will remove
> the entire region, instead of one character, to behave much more like
> cua.
This is what delete_cmd() is for: make the DEL behave like in most cua
application. Actually, it tests for a *visible* region, so a region set
with push_mark() will not be affected. This prevents nasty accidents,
as might happen else e.g. in the minibuffer.
Is there a reson, why delete_cmd() was not included in the standard
cua.sl? How about backspace_cmd()?
> Now I see also that F3 key is bound to repeat_search(), but also this
> function is missing from cuamisc.sl (while present in Günter's version).
repeat_search() is actually nice to have not only for cua. Similar
functions are ws_repeat_search() (in wordstar.sl) and most_find_n() in
most.sl.
I remember a discussion whether repeat_search() should go to site.sl...
Günter
--
G.Milde web.de
--------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to <jed-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx> with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body.
Need help? Email <jed-users-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx>.
[2005 date index]
[2005 thread index]
[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
[Date Prev] [Date Next]