Re: [slang-users] S-Lang and openmp

[jed@xxxxxxxxxxx (John E. Davis)]

Laurent Perez <laurent.perez@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I made a few experiments to make native S-Lang operators parallelized
> with openmp. Native functions (where...) could also benefit from
> parallelization.
>
> Do some of you already have work on this or are interested in it ?
>
> John, would you like S-Lang going this way or do you think that this
> black magic should stay out of core code ?

In order to provide an answer to this, I would have to see what the
changes would look like.  Since this question involves future changes
to the library itself, would you mind subscribing to the slang-devel
list and ask the question there?  The slang-devel list is designed for
such questions.

Incidently, I also created a list (slang-interp) that is meant for
questions about the interpreter language itself.  For example, "How do
I do foo with the interpreter?".

Thanks,
--John
_______________________________________________
For list information, visit <http://jedsoft.org/slang/mailinglists.html>.