Re: [slang-users] comparison operator grammar change

[Jörg Sommer <joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello John,

"John E. Davis" <davis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> For slang-2.1, I am thinking about making a change to the part of the
> grammar that deals with the four comparison operators <, <=, >, >=.
> In particular, I would like for boolean expressions such as
>
>     a < b <= c
>
> to mean
>
>     ((a < b) and (b <= c)).

A really interesting idea. I don't know other programming language that
supports such a syntax, although it is a common notation in mathematics.

> Unfortunately, such a change would break backward-compatibility.
> Currently, a<b<=c is a valid expression and is equivalent to (a<b)<=c.
> My feeling is that usage of such constructs is extremely rare

ACK.

> Any thoughts on this matter? 

I think it would be a nice feature.

Bye, Jörg.
-- 
Ein Optimist ist in der Regel ein Zeitgenosse, der ungenuegend informiert ist.
                                                           (John B. Priestley)

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, visit http://jedsoft.org/slang/mailinglists.html